Before workers and heavy equipment begin carving out the Sand Creek Byway route in Sandpoint, archaeologists will have to complete one of the largest testing and data recovery projects ITD has ever undertaken.
The Byway will be built at a junction once used by Native Americans traveling to Montana in search of buffalo or northward to the Kootenay area of Canada. The area also was the site of a construction camp for the Northern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s.
The Sandpoint project is physically one of the largest archaeological sites that ITD has overseen.
“Old documents and artifacts show that at the turn of the (20th) century the area was home to a Chinese immigrant labor camp, a bordello and a blacksmith shop,” said Dan Gard, ITD state highway archaeologist. “It’s actually part of the original Sandpoint town site.”
Cultural resource consultants started initial testing at the site in early June to help identify what to mitigate, or recover. Based on the results of that testing artifact recovery should begin this fall.
Gard, along with Marc Munch, transportation archaeologist; Dan Everhart, architectural historian; and RuthAnn Smith, curation specialist, comprise ITD’s Cultural Resources unit, whose purpose is to make certain that “we (ITD) assess the effects of our actions on cultural resources.”
“Ninety-nine percent of the resources we deal with are historical in nature,” Gard said.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires a review of all actions that may affect a property currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places, or may affect a property that may be eligible for listing.
“You have to look at cultural resources that are more than 50 years old in order to see if they might meet specific criterion that make them eligible for the National Register,” Gard said. “Cultural resources can include buildings, canals, bridges, even old roads, as well as prehistoric sites.”
No small task for a group overseeing from 50-75 projects statewide in various stages of initial survey and, in some cases, the testing and data recovery phase. And it’s not slowing down. An increasing number of projects requires the use of consultants for field surveys that ITD used to conduct exclusively.
“If time allows, we still go out and conduct survey work for the districts,” Gard said. “It’s fun. It’s nice when we can get out in the field. We each have our own niche in terms of expertise, but we work on projects as a team.”
“We’ve saved ITD a considerable amount of money on projects requiring cultural resources survey,” he said, adding that an outside consultant hired to survey a two-acre site can cost several thousand dollars. “The price goes up if the site requires mitigation,” he said.
Archaeologists perform site testing or surveying using several techniques:
Once retrieved, artifacts are cleaned, sorted, labeled, catalogued, documented, and prepared for long-term storage at one of three regional repositories that together form the Archaeological Survey of Idaho (ASI).
“ITD shows good stewardship by working to protect cultural resources,” Gard said.
“Everything we do is for a reason,” he said. “The laws we follow are triggered by some federal connection to an ITD undertaking. Even on state projects without federal funding we essentially follow the same steps.”
The steps include conducting a cultural resources survey of a project’s effects on a specific area. This usually is part of the overall environmental assessment. If the survey shows that cultural resources in an area will be affected, ITD must mitigate the effects of their project actions. In most cases consultants are brought in to remove any artifacts that are in the way of the project. Finally, the results of the artifact recovery are made available to the public.
To accomplish this, ITD archaeologists work two or more
years in front of projects.
“Archaeologists find some of the most interesting stuff in odd places, such as old, abandoned outhouses,” he said. “They can be a treasure trove because a lot of things, such as used or broken household items, were often dumped in them.”
Photos: (left to right, top photo)
Dan Gard, Dan Everhart and Marc Munch oversee ITD cultural resource
projects statewide in various stages of survey, testing and recovery;