![]() |
Idaho Transportation Department |
![]() |
|
||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Advisory Boards And CommitteesBoard HomeBoard MembersMeeting Schedule & AgendasMeeting MinutesDirector's Board ReportSubcommittee on Adjustments to State Highway SystemITD Executive TeamContact Information ![]() |
SPECIAL
WORK SESSION OF THE IDAHO TRANSPORTATION BOARD October 19, 2012 Idaho
Transportation Board Chairman Jerry Whitehead called a special work session of
the Idaho Transportation Board at 1:00 PM on Friday, October 19, 2012. The
following principals were present at the Idaho Transportation Department in
Boise, Idaho: Jerry Whitehead, Chairman Jim Coleman, Vice Chairman –
District 1 Julie DeLorenzo, Member – District 3 Lee Gagner, Member – District 6 Brian W. Ness, Director Larry Allen, Deputy Attorney General Sue S. Higgins, Executive Assistant
and Secretary to the Board Chairman Whitehead thanked
the participants for attending the special work session. He noted the session
is optional and the other Board members were excused from attending. Transportation and Economic Development Zone (TEDZ).
Consultant Jeremy Pisca explained the federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance
and Innovation Act (TIFIA), whereby federal funds are available as a loan to
states for transportation projects. TIFIA funds could be used for up to 49% of
project costs, including environmental work and preliminary design. The minimum
size of a rural project is $25 million. Interest rates would be ½ of the
standard US Treasury rate at the date of close. TIFIA could be used with the TEDZ
proposal. Mr. Pisca said TEDZ involves identifying boundaries and diverting a
portion of the estimated sales taxes collected within that zone to a specific
project fund. The fund is continuously appropriated for the purpose of paying
the debt service of the highway project. The proposal requires ITD and the
Department of Commerce to work cooperatively to select a state highway project
to fund via this mechanism and also to approve the boundaries. An economist
would need to determine the total revenue impact within the zone, which must be
at least twice the cost of the infrastructure improvements. Additionally, a
majority of local jurisdictions within the identified boundary must approve
formation of the zone. ITD retains control over the highway projects. Mr. Pisca
also emphasized that TEDZ would be an optional funding mechanism. The
Departments of Commerce and Transportation would determine if and where it
would be used. He added that revenue collected in the zone that is in excess of
the required loan payment would be diverted to the General Fund. The entire
state could benefit from this proposal. Discussion followed on the proposal.
Some of the concerns included the ongoing costs to maintain new routes and purchase
maintenance equipment, the liability of a continuously-appropriated fund based
on sales tax collections, and that small areas may be precluded from
participating. Money for the non-TIFIA funded portion of the project could come
from various sources. Federal formula funds could be used for 31% of the costs.
Other options may be tolls or local option taxes. In response to a question on who
would pay for the economist to study a proposed zone, Mr. Pisca said that
expense would be shared between the Departments of Commerce and Transportation.
When it was suggested that a private entity be allowed to fund the economic
study, Mr. Pisca replied that the intent is to keep the study independent. The
accuracy of a private entity’s study may be questioned. Mark Warbis,
Communications Director from the Governor’s Office, asked about an escape
mechanism in case the economy plummets. He asked who would be responsible to
repay the loan if sales tax revenue from the zone is the only funding source
and those funds are insufficient. Economist Dr. John Church replied that the
economists’ initial funding review would estimate the funding potential for a
long period of time. He noted that historically, the economy goes up and down.
Vice Chairman Coleman suggested diverting excess revenue during good economic
times to a reserve account to be used for debt payment if the revenue generated
does not meet the estimated projections. Chairman Whitehead thanked the
participants for the additional information on the proposal. WHEREUPON the special session of the
Transportation Board adjourned at 2:45 PM. ______________signed___________ Jerry Whitehead, Chairman Read and Approved November
14, 2012 Boise,
Idaho
|